Working Guidelines for the Copyright Project

“Any analysis of ownership and duration must be performed on a case-by-case basis for each work.”
Copyright & Cultural Institutions: Guidelines for Digitization for U.S. Libraries, Archives & Museums.
Peter Hirtle, Emily Hudson and Andrew T. Kenyon (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Library, 2009)

Given this statement, from some of the best authorities in the field, we faced a dilemma:

  • We have tens of thousands of objects in the Museum collection.
  • We want to put the entire collection on line so people will have access to both data and images, even if they’re only thumbnails, likely to fall within the Fair Use exception to copyright protection.
  • We want to be clear about rights, not just for our purposes (we acquire a license when we want to use an object that’s protected by copyright), but to communicate clearly and honestly with members of the community.
  • However, we don’t always have all of the information needed to identify artists or the dates of the works, and may never be able to acquire all of the needed data. We may have to make our best guess. Works of art are not like books: they don’t have the author and publication date printed on the title page and “publication,” necessary for analyzing copyright status, is not as clear cut for works of art as it is for books.

Our solution:

  • Paint with broad strokes, dividing the collection into under copyright and no known copyright (i.e. we think it’s in the public domain) using broad rules of thumb:
  • Work created before 1923: no known copyright restrictions
  • Work created from 1923 to the present: under copyright, even though copyright may have expired. Someone with the time and resources to do detailed, case-by-case research may be able to clear the work
  • Anonymous artists: works created before 1890: no known copyright restrictions.
  • Brooklyn Museum photographs of three-dimensional works not protected by copyright: Creative Commons license
  • Open the website to comment and draw on community knowledge to correct and refine.
  • Err on the side of protecting artists’ rights.
  • Use thumbnails, likely to fall within the Fair Use exception to copyright protection, whenever a work may be protected by copyright.
  • Take the risk to get the information out there (but include language from the Museum counsel so that it’s clear we’re not providing legal advice)
  • Provide links to authoritative resources on copyright.
  • Collaborate with other museums and groups interested in art and image copyright.

Some sample records:
no known copyright restrictions
under copyright
under copyright, license obtained
three-dimensional work, Creative Commons license
status unknown, research required

Author profile

About Deborah Wythe

Deborah Wythe manages the Brooklyn Museum’s Digital Collections and Services department (the “Digital Lab”), coordinating digital imaging activities museum-wide, including the photo studio, scan lab, digital asset management, and rights and reproductions. Before moving to the Digital Lab, Deb was the Museum Archivist, where she managed the Museum’s historical records and worked on several technology-driven projects. Deb edited the new edition of Museum Archives: An Introduction, published by the Society of American Archivists in 2004, and wrote the chapters on the museum context, appraisal, description, records surveys, and photographs. Prior to joining the Brooklyn Museum staff, she worked on the Steinway Collection at the LaGuardia and Wagner Archives and, as an intern, organized the records of the Department of Musical Instruments at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. In her previous life, before discovering archives work (she has always been a museum maven), Deb earned her Master’s and PhD in musicology at NYU. She still studies the piano.
Filed under: Digital Lab, Technology
Tagged: , ,
Bookmark the permalink

4 Responses to Working Guidelines for the Copyright Project

  1. Thanks for sharing this. It´s been a great help for me writing my master thesis on museums and social media. Copyright is one of the major issues on art museums but with the documentation on your work there is no longer any excuse. And salute to all your hard work!

  2. Thanks Birgitte. It’s always helpful to see others out there who are working on similar projects, so we hope that by jumping into the rights pond, we’ll give others the encouragement to do so too. The more of us who do it, the easier it’ll get.

  3. jim hayes says:

    love the discussion. a few quibbles: not creation date, but “published” date (more complicated); public domain 70 years after death of creator; work published before 1978 without a notice; photos of 3D works are derivative works, subject to above – see the Korean War Veterans Memorial case.

  4. Deborah Wythe says:

    Hi Jim,
    Thanks for the comments. Painting with broad strokes definitely leaves much room for discussion. Our goal was to set some workable guidelines, erring on the side of protecting artists when there was a question. When we can, we get a non-exclusive license. When we can’t, then we dig into the details of publication date, copyright notice, registration status, etc. If you click through on the rights statements on works of art, you’ll see some explanations (including the necessary lawyer-speak–sorry) and resources to help people learn more.
    It’s a work in progress!
    Deb Wythe
    Digital Lab

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

5 Reactions

  1. Pingback: Brooklyn Museum: Community: bloggers@brooklynmuseum » Little Images, Big Art

  2. Pingback: Brooklyn Museum: Community: bloggers@brooklynmuseum » Highlights from the Pacific Islands Collection on the Web

  3. Pingback: Jonathan Melber: The Brooklyn Museum’s Copyright Project | Loans in

  4. Pingback: London The » Jonathan Melber: The Brooklyn Museum’s Copyright Project

  5. Pingback: DC Copyright and Trademark Lawyer » Museums & Copyright: The Brooklyn Museum