 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
 |
|
| |
 |
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
Summary of This Activity |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
 |
Statue of Ity-sen
Limestone
Old Kingdom, Dynasty 5, circa 2500–2350 B.C.
From Giza, tomb of Ra-wer
61 x 20 1/2 x 15 3/16 in.
(155 x 52 x 38.5 cm)
37.365, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
The BMA acquired this statue
of a standing man in 1937. In 1945, Brooklyn Museum Curator
John Cooney showed that this figure was originally part of a
larger statuary group that included five figures, and that it
represents a man named Ity-sen.
In the spring of 2002, the statue underwent significant treatment
in the BMA’s conservation labs in preparation for reinstallation. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Reuniting Ity-sen with
His Family
Originally, Ity-sen was accompanied by a figure of his wife,
Hetep-heres. They were “Royal Acquaintances” (nobles).
Ity-sen and Hetep-heres stood on either side of their son, Ra-wer,
along with Ra-wer’s son and daughter. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The group was broken apart
and the heads knocked off, possibly in ancient times. The individual
figures were brought to the United States in the 1920s and are
currently in five different museum collections. The other four
figures are: |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
Ra-wer
Ra-wer, Ity-sen’s son, was a very important man.
His titles, including royal hairdresser, indicate that
he was a personal attendant to the king. The complete
family group statue stood in Ra-wer’s tomb, so he
was depicted as the largest and most central of the five
figures. This figure is in the collection of the Nelson-Atkins
Museum in Kansas City, Missouri. |
| |
|
| |
 |
 |
Statue of Ra-wer
Limestone
Old Kingdom, Dynasty 5, circa 2500–2350 B.C.
From Giza, tomb of Ra-wer
70 x 25 3/4 x 16 1/2
in. (175 x 64 x 41 1/4 cm)
38-11, The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art, Kansas City,
Missouri
Purchase: Nelson Trust
Photograph by Robert Newcomb |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Lady Hetep-heres
Lady Hetep-heres was Ity-sen’s wife and Ra-wer’s
mother. This figure of her is now at the Worcester Art
Museum in Massachusetts. Lady Hetep-heres was originally
shown embracing her son, and traces of her right hand
are still visible around his waist. |
| |
|
| |
 |
 |
Statue of Hetep-heres
Limestone
Old Kingdom, Dynasty 5, circa 2500–2350 B.C.
From Giza, tomb of Ra-wer
Height: 54 in. (137 cm)
1934.48, Worcester Art Museum, Worcester, Massachusetts |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Boy Ra-wer
This small figure of Ra-wer’s son, also named Ra-wer,
is in the collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art
in New York. The child was originally depicted on his
father’s left side, and only as tall as his father’s
thigh. Ancient Egyptian artists usually depicted small
children naked with a sidelock of hair and a finger-to-mouth
gesture. |
| |
|
| |
 |
 |
Statue of the Boy Ra-wer
Limestone
Old Kingdom, Dynasty 5, circa 2500–2350 B.C.
From Giza, tomb of Ra-wer
18 x 8 1/2 in. (45 x 21.25 cm)
66.195, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York,
Purchase, Rogers Fund, 1966. (66.195) Photograph,
all rights reserved, The Metropolitan Museum of
Art. |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Girl Hetep-heres
This small figure of Ra-wer’s daughter, named after
her grandmother Hetep-heres, is in the Robert V. Fullerton
Art Museum in California. The child was originally depicted
between Ity-sen and Ra-wer, embracing her father’s
leg. Traces of her hand are still visible near Ra-wer’s
right knee. |
| |
|
| |
 |
 |
Statue of a Young Girl (Hetep-heres)
Limestone
Old Kingdom, Dynasty 5, circa 2500–2350 B.C.
From Giza, tomb of Ra-wer
21 1/4 in. (54 cm)
01.005.2001, Robert V. Fullerton Art Museum, California
State University, San Bernadino, California
Gift of the Harer Family Trust, 2002. |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
The Reunited Family
This illustration gives you some idea of how the statue
would have looked before its parts were separated. |
| |
|
| |
 |
 |
Drawing of the Reunited
Group Statue of Ity-sen, Ra-wer, and their Family
Illustration after Dan Chaffee, The Nelson-Atkins
Museum of Art, Kansas City, Missouri |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Follow the Statue’s
Conservation
In the spring of 2002, Katrina Posner, a graduate conservation
intern from the Art Conservation Department at Buffalo State
College, began work on the conservation of Ity-sen’s figure.
The treatment included removing the statue from its former exhibition
case, taking apart the figure along previous breaklines, examining
and removing earlier restorations (adhesives and plaster), replacing
those with more stable materials, and reassembling the statue.
The following photographs give some sense of this process. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Katrina determined that the
statue was broken in several places. Some of these breaks may
have been intentional, to simplify the statue’s shipment
out of Egypt. At some point the statue had been reassembled
with adhesive and some of the cracks filled with plaster and
overpainted. |
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
The space between the statue’s
legs had been filled with plaster during an earlier treatment,
perhaps in 1937. In 2002, Katrina determined that the plaster
infill was not necessary for the statue’s stability and
removed it. |
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
After Katrina and BMA staff
carefully removed the statue from its case, they discovered
that its original solid stone back had been hollowed out—perhaps
to make it lighter for transportation—and filled with
plaster. Here you see the statue from the side, on its front. |
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
With the help of several art
handlers, Katrina placed the statue face down to view the plaster
filling in its hollowed-out back, legs, and arms. She later
removed the plaster—which was not original—in order
to work with the statue. Even without this plaster filling,
the statue weighs about 300 pounds. |
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
After examining the statue,
Katrina identified this portion of the torso as thin plaster
filling, not original stone. |
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Katrina located the outline
of the thin plaster filling on the front of the statue’s
torso, and then used small dental tools and scalpels to work
away the plaster fill, revealing the original stone surface.
Conservators decided that removing the remaining plaster from
the front would negatively affect the statue’s appearance. |
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Katrina refilled the cracks
and then repainted the surface so it would appear smooth and
match the original. |
|
| |
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|