Madonna of Humility, portable altarpiece

Andrea di Bartolo

1 of 4

Object Label

This devotional triptych (a painting on three panels) was intended for use in a private chapel or a corner of the home. The Virgin is depicted sitting directly on the ground instead of on a throne, a so-called Madonna of Humility, which emphasizes her humble, relatable position as a mother. The triptych would not have hung flat on a wall but rather stood on its own base on a table, with its two sides opened at an angle to the central panel. The intimate scale and enclosing configuration invited pious viewers to immerse themselves in the sacred.

Caption

Andrea di Bartolo Italian, Sienese, active by 1389, died 1428. Madonna of Humility, portable altarpiece, ca. 1410. Tempera and tooled gold on poplar panels, Central panel: 16 11/16 x 7 1/8 in. (42.4 x 18.1 cm) Side panels: 15 15/16 x 3 1/4 in. (40.5 x 8.3 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Gift of Mary Babbott Ladd, Lydia Babbott Stokes, and Frank L. Babbott, Jr. in memory of their father Frank L. Babbott, 34.839. No known copyright restrictions (Photo: Brooklyn Museum, 34.839_SL3.jpg)

Gallery

Not on view

Collection

European Art

Title

Madonna of Humility, portable altarpiece

Date

ca. 1410

Geography

Place made: Italy

Medium

Tempera and tooled gold on poplar panels

Classification

Painting

Dimensions

Central panel: 16 11/16 x 7 1/8 in. (42.4 x 18.1 cm) Side panels: 15 15/16 x 3 1/4 in. (40.5 x 8.3 cm)

Inscriptions

On scroll of the Angel Annunciate: "AVE MA"

Credit Line

Gift of Mary Babbott Ladd, Lydia Babbott Stokes, and Frank L. Babbott, Jr. in memory of their father Frank L. Babbott

Accession Number

34.839

Rights

No known copyright restrictions

This work may be in the public domain in the United States. Works created by United States and non-United States nationals published prior to 1923 are in the public domain, subject to the terms of any applicable treaty or agreement. You may download and use Brooklyn Museum images of this work. Please include caption information from this page and credit the Brooklyn Museum. If you need a high resolution file, please fill out our online application form (charges apply). The Museum does not warrant that the use of this work will not infringe on the rights of third parties, such as artists or artists' heirs holding the rights to the work. It is your responsibility to determine and satisfy copyright or other use restrictions before copying, transmitting, or making other use of protected items beyond that allowed by "fair use," as such term is understood under the United States Copyright Act. The Brooklyn Museum makes no representations or warranties with respect to the application or terms of any international agreement governing copyright protection in the United States for works created by foreign nationals. For further information about copyright, we recommend resources at the United States Library of Congress, Cornell University, Copyright and Cultural Institutions: Guidelines for U.S. Libraries, Archives, and Museums, and Copyright Watch. For more information about the Museum's rights project, including how rights types are assigned, please see our blog posts on copyright. If you have any information regarding this work and rights to it, please contact copyright@brooklynmuseum.org.

Frequent Art Questions

  • Any egg tempera paintings?

    Oh, let me look into that! Are you an artist? I have found that artists are often interested in materials.
    Sort of! I just came from the library and saw some really amazing egg tempera paintings.
    Many of the religious paintings in the Beaux-Arts Court, where you are, were painted with tempera. In the Renaissance-era, tempera was mixed with egg and that material practice has been used actually since ancient Egypt through the Renaissance until it was eventually replaced with oil paints.
    Oh! Awesome! Why was it replaced?
    Mainly because the effects that can be achieved with oil paints are much greater than with tempera. Artists could achieve more color, depth and contrasts with oil. Oil takes much longer to dry allowing the artist to continually make changes and add layers of color. The surface is often brighter.
  • What era in art is this?

    This was made late in the Medieval period, right before the Renaissance began.
    How does this differ from Byzantine art?
    It's actually quite similar. Painting styles in Medieval Italy were strongly based on Byzantine precedents, especially the use of gold ground and standardized depictions of Christian religious figures. The beginning of the Italian Renaissance is characterized by a return to Classical standards in art especially a closer attention to realism in the human form.
    The Byzantine, or Eastern Roman Empire was centered in modern day Istanbul and existed from the 4th to the 16th century. It was an important early seat of Christianity and many religious artistic standards were set there.
    Ohhh
  • This seems like the darkest blue I’ve ever seen on any Madonna, and darker than the other blues on the piece itself - is this intentional or maybe related to the aging of the work?

    The darkness of the blue as it appears today is definitely related to the aging of the piece. It always would have been somewhat darker than the blues you see the male figures wearing, though, it was made with a different pigment.
    The artist was interested in portraying a difference between the Madonna and the other figures. He would have used a different pigment to paint a deeper blue for her mantle. Ultramarine (one of the most expensive pigments at the time) and similar shades were reserved for the Madonna and other figures held in the highest esteem.
  • Why is this piece called Madonna of Humility?

    "Madonna of Humility" refers to the way that the Madonna is depicted here, sitting in a grassy garden instead of enthroned. It is meant to present here as a humble and (importantly) relatable mother.
    The Madonna of Humility type was especially popular for private devotion as opposed to an image of the Madonna enthroned as the queen of heaven as you might see in altarpieces designed for cathedrals.
  • Why does the baby look like an adult?

    The Christ child does look very grown up, doesn't he? This may be to show that he had a special divine role to play. It is also important to remember that artists at this time typically did not sketch babies from life. Things often look a little unusual when you have to sketch only from memory.
  • Can I get some more information on the "Madonna of Humility"?

    This is a small and portable altarpiece. It was meant for personal devotion in the home, private family chapel, or in the cells of monks and friars, as required.
    Altarpieces helped individuals to engage quietly with beloved saints on an intimate, emotional level, rather than the communal ritual of Mass.
    The central panel shows the Madonna of Humility, a popular way of portraying the Virgin Mary in the later Middle Ages and early Renaissance. She is seated humbly on the ground, holding the Christ child in her lap. The delicate fringe of grasses and flowers below the Madonna of Humility indicates that she is in a garden, a traditional symbol of the Virgin.

Have information?

Have information about an artwork? Contact us at

bkmcollections@brooklynmuseum.org.